http://ouranus.blogspot.com/2011/05/blog-post_3517.html
https://app.box.com/s/fmwzvkg7z126cgsodtxs6n01xrywx5e8
Friday, March 13, 2020
Friday, March 6, 2020
Cutting the hands while studying mathematics
Yet at this conjecture in time for Now I'm going to end this post with a bit of geometrical facts and figures
Hit enter to search or ESC to close
11-1616-1919+I love MathsWhat’s the biggest number?
26th May 2014No Comments
Home / What’s the biggest number?
Numbers go on forever – but on the way to infinity, there are some pretty remote way posts.
To our ancestors, a million was as big as numbers needed to get. There was no need to invoke the billions (1,000,000,000) of finance or the terabytes (1012) of computing. Technology has made us blasé about using 9 or 12 digit numbers in conversation. However, there’s a long way to go before we even catch up with the scale of our place in the universe, let alone the dizzyingly gigantic numbers mathematicians have dreamed up.
Standard numbers
Past a billion – the order of magnitude of the human population – we really have to wave goodbye to the idea of having names for numbers. (Although they do exist up to 1063, they’re not in common usage). For the distance light travels in a minute, the number of atoms in a gram of carbon, or the distance between galaxies, scientists use standard form to express themselves. Standard form records all numbers in the format a × 10n, where a is a number between 1 and 10 and n can be any number. It’s what you’d use to talk about the number of carbon atoms in a 12g sample. Which, incidentally, is 6.22 × 1023, Avogadro’s number, and quite large. The observable universe is about 8.8 × 1023 km wide, and there are an estimated 1087 particles in it. But bigger than those numbers by far are the constructs of mathematical minds.
Let me googol it for you
Immortalised in common usage by the internet giant, a googol is the number 10100 – 10, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000. The American mathematician Edward Kasnerasked his nephew Milton to name it, and a googol it became. But the next really big number is the googolplex, which raises 10 to the power of a googol. This is astronomically bigger than a googol – it’s impossible to write a googolplex down in standard notation even if you wrote a single digit on each particle in the universe.
The power of powers
Adding an exponential into the exponent really increases the rate of enlarging numbers.
3×3×3=27
3(33) = 7,625,597,484,987
Naturally, on a quest for bigger numbers, one would add more and more powers to the tower. This rapidly gets awkward to write down though, as well as resulting in towers that make Pisa’s look stable. Changing notation makes it possible to condense these towers down and express higher concepts.
Follow the arrows
Developing another way to denote powers:
Donald Knuth coined a new operator for repeated exponentiation (“tetration”), to bring those power towers down to earth.
In use, the double arrow looks like this:
This can be extended still further by adding a third arrow, creating the operation of ‘pentation’ – repeated tetration.
In words, that involves tetrating a to the a (so, a power tower of a ‘a’s), then building another tower of ‘a’s as high as that power tower, then using the result of that power tower to determine the number of ‘a’s in the next one –resulting in the calculating of b power towers, increasing in height according to the result of the previous tetration.
And more arrows can still be added, although thinking about the operations they denote may require more brain time than you’re prepared to devote to the issue. But armed with this notation, we can now acknowledge some truly big numbers.
Calling Ackermann and Graham
Mathematical proofs have given us some massive quantities. At the start of the twentieth century, mathematicians wanted to know how to tell if a sequence was computable – could a mechanical process for working it out be defined? It was proposed that a sequence was computable if it had the property of being ‘primitive recursive’. Wilhelm Ackermann threw a sequence-shaped spanner in the works by coining a sequence that, while computable, wasn’t primitive recursive. And it goes like this:
Start with the simplest mathematical operation possible – addition. Apply this to the first natural number, 1:
1 + 1 = 2
Then progress to the next operation, multiplication (repeated addition). Do this to the next number:
2 × 2 = 4
Next up is repeated multiplication – exponentiation to you and me – with 3 as a variable.
33 = 27
So far, so puny. But we just defined a function for repeated exponentiation, tetration, and if we do this to 4..
Looks small, has 10154 digits. And this is just the 4th term in the sequence.
Fifth is … a power tower of fives digits high.
Sixth is . Just five symbols denote a number bigger than there is room for in the universe, even if you wrote each digit in a font 1nm wide. And the sequence continues.
The same up-arrow notation was used by Ronald Graham to limit some properties of a hypercube (a cube in 4 spatial dimensions), although ‘Graham’s number’ is now better known simply for being collossal.
Graham’s number is defined like this:
The number of arrows in each layer is given by the result of evaluating the arrows in the layer below, until after 64 layers, the final number is reached. To give you some idea of the size of this, we can look at the first layer alone:
where the number of threess in the expression on the right is
Now each tetration () operation reduces to a “tower” of exponentiations () according to the definition
where there are X threes.
Thus,
where the number of threes is , becomes, solely in terms of repeated “exponentiation towers”, and where the number of threes in each tower, starting from the leftmost tower, is specified by the value of the next tower to the right.
That is, technically speaking, a lot of threes. Don’t relax yet though, as Graham’s number, while being the biggest number that mathematicians have yet needed to write down explicitly, is dwarfed by some products of computing theory. We don’t have space to go into them here, but check out ‘Who can write down the bigger number?’ by Scott Aaronson if Graham’s number just wasn’t enough for you. It also goes into more detail about the history of big numbers and their explanations.
Big, Bigger, Biggest
The world of numbers is, as you might expect, infinite. Nature is pretty big, but the numbers she requires us to use are far smaller than those that human mathematicians have dreamed up. In that sense, the human mind is bigger than the universe.
Love0 Share Tweet Share
Categories11-1616-1919+Business & MoneyCareersCompetitionsEnvironment & HeathI love MathsNewsProfilesScience & EngineeringSport & Entertainment
Tags
Careers Advisor Competition Winners Cymru Data Science Profile Teacher
ArchivesDecember 2020November 2020October 2019July 2019April 2019March 2019February 2019January 2019December 2018October 2018September 2018August 2018July 2018June 2018April 2018March 2018February 2018January 2018November 2017October 2017September 2017August 2017July 2017April 2017March 2017February 2017January 2017December 2016November 2016October 2016September 2016August 2016July 2016June 2016April 2016March 2016February 2016January 2016December 2015November 2015October 2015September 2015August 2015July 2015June 2015May 2015April 2015March 2015February 2015January 2015November 2014September 2014June 2014May 2014March 2014February 2014November 2013August 2013June 2013
Previous PostTrouble in coral city
Next PostThe number-one crime fighter
Related Posts
11-1616-1919+Environment & HeathProfiles
An interview with Professor Reidun Twarock, Mathematical Biologist and winner of the 2018 IMA Gold Medal
16th December 2020
11-1616-1919+
Saturday, February 29, 2020
https://toospirituallytrue.blogspot.com/2017/10/the-twin-towers-connected-to-c7q92-of.html
American Gothic Swing - YouTube
Apr 23, 2014 - Uploaded by Doc Teeth
Bright Lights Late Nights - the Speakeasies' Swing Band! (Official Music Video). ballenadepapel ... American ...
You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 15/04/19
https://toospirituallytrue.blogspot.com/2017/10/the-twin-towers-connected-to-c7q92-of.html
We're a bunch of weirdos! - YouTube
www.youtube.com › watch
Sep 17, 2013 - Uploaded by Prussiapants
Excerpt from the 1987 horror classic, American Gothic. Please check out http://
You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 04/07/19
https://tickleetookuumms.blogspot.com/2019/05/hermaphroditusc2q45-monday-may-2-2011_56.
Thursday, February 27, 2020
.
=
..
.
.
TO CONTINUE COMMITTING HYPOCRITICAL SINS AGAINST GODS LAWS AND AGAINST THE WELFARE OF MOTHER EARTH IN THIS LIFE.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/12526539/YWKAGhYRcWLX6rVjr4uQ_Waving_Arm_Guys.0.gif)
SHOULD YOU BE MY DOMINATRIX? WELL, I DON'T KNOW? YOU THINK YOU GOT WHAT IT TAKES?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The following website summarizes the relevant facts of this life appropriately in images videos and words.😮 Sporadically …In various logica...
-
Societysm Dia Zerva Queen Bondage Hotties Xxx Free PornPics SexPhotos xXxImages HD Gallery! jjgirls.com SocietySM, Rope...
