Sunday, September 27, 2020


πŸ₯³πŸΆπŸ₯³πŸ™€πŸ˜±

Sometimes I ask myself why ""ghenghis khan went down in human history as killing millions upon millions of people.
In his life.🧝‍♂️🐸🀑

Yet still is """ generally speaking" renowned or respected in human history.

🀑πŸ₯³πŸ€ͺ

Which shallows in comparison to what most people get for murder in this life.

Connected to the following.

For example.πŸ™€πŸŽ…πŸ˜

Regarding the following youtube video. For example.

https://youtu.be/Fr2xFdQqv9A

https://youtu.be/Fr2xFdQqv9A

And 

Regarding the following videos suspect.



For example.🐸🧝‍♂️πŸ§™‍♀️

Who let us say " for the record"is now known as

""☆☆☆PRETTY COOKIE☆☆☆in an Illinois prison in the usa.


https://youtu.be/Fr2xFdQqv9A

🦹‍♂️πŸ§™‍♀️🧞‍♂️

Aw yes the suspect in the preceding video just referred to in this website is now named"" pretty cookie' in an illinois prison and now serves big strong men in an Illinois prison.πŸŽ„πŸ˜πŸŽ…

Serving them daily meals. Sexually.

Shall we say.

As their female slave.

In male form..🧝‍♂️🧚‍♂️🧜‍♀️

Actually

A sexual party is conducted in his mouth each night. At 6 pm.πŸ™€πŸ§‍♂️😱

In the showers of the prison he now resides in.

For the sexual pleasures and sweet entertainments galore of many men.

Who call him their "" pretty blessed sexual  cookie  now.πŸ˜»πŸ’πŸ˜²

Aw yes.

Exactly.

Albeit regardless to the point of this letter I am now forwarding in writing " just for the sake of record let this now be addressed  in writing.

Regarding the above information just forwrded in writing g likewise.πŸ˜±πŸΈπŸ’©

Worded as follows.

In comparison to the man now known as cookie" in a sweet illinois prison in the United states of america πŸ™€πŸ₯³πŸ€–

The 13th century mongrel 

""""Ghenghis khan"""" quite literally killed millions more then cookie did  INTHIS life. Perhaps even a billion. 
1 3rd of earths population actually.
In or around the 13th century of a d.πŸ€–πŸΈπŸ˜±

Yet khan was never charged with murder at all.

But " cute cookie" now residing as a pleasure slave for countless men in an Illinois prison was.

Fascinating eh?

Cookie was charged with murder.πŸ’©πŸ˜…πŸ‘Œ

But ghenghis was exempt from that concept or rule of this life for mortals.

Shall we say.

Ya wonder what sweet cookie thinks of that?

.🧟‍♂️πŸ€”πŸ˜»

In fact  for the record " regarding ghenghis khan"""specifically"most accounts of factual sweet  human history portray him in a good light.
.


Despite the obvious fact ghenghis khan murdered millions of people in a violent perhaps clinically deranged way in this life.

With swords and axes and other weapons.

πŸ€–πŸ₯³πŸ™€
Earths history books generally speak respectfully of ghenghis khan.

Despite that obvious factual information.

In history.πŸ’©πŸ˜»πŸ§Ÿ‍♂️

In this life.



Yet' in comparison "" millions upon millions of people in this life have murdered just one or two people for which their basically condemned forever.


πŸ˜²πŸ’πŸ˜»


And spend their whole lives locked in a prison.
.

Interesting.πŸ™€πŸΈπŸ’©

Eh?

Huh?

Yes.

🀑🧟‍♂️πŸ€”

That is interesting.

And intriguing to consider.


Also another thing that should be mentioned is this.

πŸ™€πŸ₯³πŸ€–

 the biblical men gideon joshua  and david all hacked millions of people apart with swords actually in their lives too....


πŸ˜»πŸ’πŸ˜²


Yet for the appropriate sake of factual record" despite that truth" it is also factual that the great biblical men gideon  david and Joshua are all renowned by human historians as gloriously righteous.πŸ™€πŸ§‍♂️😱

And well respected by human historians too.

In this life.

In fact the christian bible even says GOD HIMSELF consented to those men being righteous.

πŸ˜»πŸ’πŸ˜²

For being basically homicidal violent  maniac killers of many people  in this life.


Neither did they spend any time in prisons.
Either.

πŸΆπŸ‰πŸ˜±

Generally speaking..




In comparison " for the record"  to billions upon billions of other sweet  humans in this life who killed just once.πŸ’©πŸ˜»πŸ§Ÿ‍♂️




And yetspend their whole lives miserable in prisons for only one murder.

πŸ™€πŸ₯³πŸ€–

Compare the difference?


Interesting?πŸ™€πŸ€ͺ🀸‍♂️

Connected to psalm 32: 1 to 2.

Exactly.

Yes.

Exactly.πŸ™€πŸ₯³πŸ€–


Just something strange  to think about in

 this life.

Eh?πŸ€”πŸ§Ÿ‍♂️🀑


People?


✈πŸ˜²πŸ’
On that note?


πŸΊπŸ‘ŒπŸ˜…




Yes.

That is a note to consider.

In this life for people.

πŸ€ͺ🧝‍♂️🐸

Connected to this.





πŸ™€πŸ₯³πŸ€–

Ouranus.blogspot.com


What does it mean?


IF My  SWEET EVIL younger Awesome brother ""THE ANCIENT OF DAYS """JEHOVAH---" REFERRRED TO IN DANIEL 4: 35 """ AUTHORISES SOMEONE TO KILL ANOTHER BEING IN THIS LIFE THEN THAT BEING IS EXEMPT FROM WHAT CHRISTIANITY ADDRESSES TO ALL CREATION  IN EXODUS 20 : 6.





OBVIOUSLY.

AS ROMANS 4: 7 - 8  STATES.


AS I ALSO EXPLAIN FOR MORTALS HERE.

IN THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE.


OURANUS.BLOGSPOT.COM 





EXACTLY.







Precisely.

Woe yes.


PRECISELY.






πŸ˜±πŸ‘ŒπŸ˜²


Humanity today would be wise to read what I address there.😻🧟‍♂️🀑





In that website.


On that note.🀸‍♂️πŸ‡πŸ˜±

I'm just warning you.


Tikalicious?πŸ€ͺ🧝‍♂️🐸
On that note?

Woe yes.
TOUCHE.πŸ™€πŸ₯³πŸ€–
Uh huh.







I now close this opening journal to this website with this information.

Addressed as follows.



This final address attached to this first post located upon this website " right here"
Relates to a youtube video attached immediately below.

Relating to a lady by the name of hannah payne.

And on that note I state the following.



I wrote a comment yesterday in the comment section of such a video  that proves this woman could be innocent of the crime this video accuses her of..


The comment was factual.

And written most  respectfully.

And despite the respectful way in which it was written weirdly enough " despite that it appears  youtube deleted it.

Or the predominant forceful prejudiced against all whites black people such an honorable truthful comment out of the comment section of such a site.

Wow?



So.
On that note I now state the following.



How callous.

Correct?

Yes.
That is clearly callous.

Obviously.

So?


Should I write it again?

By way of luke 12: 2 to 3?

And matthew 12: 37?

To see if youtube will CALLOUSLY delete it again?





Hmmnnn?

Should I bother?

Do things twice is ridiculous if it's already been done correctly.





Okay.
I'll do it once more.
But be warned youtube.
By way of my association to c5q79 of the quatrains of nostradamus I would highly suggest you do not delete this comment again.

Okay.
So let's get to it.





.
If the woman is as panicky as it appears she is while the gentleman driving drunk is trying to kill someone with his car because hes driving  drunk then obviously in such a confusing situation deployed by two idiots " its possible" the woman may have lost a proper grip on the gun.






Correct?

Of course that's true.

Also its likewise possible that the idiotic drunk who was trying to kill someone by driving drunk may have foolishly pulled the barrel of the gun into his chest, put his finger on the trigger and then pulled the trigger shooting himself in the chest.

Obviously.

That's clearly a possibility.
When all the facts of this subject and situation are properly evaluated.







In full.

And anyone in their right mind would admit that this woman had every right to try and stop a drunk from getting a murder charge throufh drunk driving by way of a dui.

Obviously.

That's even an american law.
The law that was portrayed on the tv program  seinfeld actually.




Last episode.
Where the four seinfeld characters all get arrested for not assisting in a serious situation where someone may be a danger to others.

Clearly this black man was a menace and  dangerous to others.
Because he was driving drunk.

The woman therefore was doing her civic duty in trying to stop an evil black man from killing somebody with a car.

That factual statement also proves this white woman is probably innocent of this so called homicide.

Irrefutably that statement is correct.

All facts related to such a matter impute that this woman is innocent.
And shes being framed by a callous black community who do not care that this white woman is truly innocent.

Here.

The woman is telling the truth.

Shes clearly innocent.
I just proved that.
In words.

WITH ADDRESSED FACTS.

FACTS.

FACTS!!
LOOK AT WHAT I JUST WROTE


LOOK CLOSELY 

THIS WOMAN IS CLEARLY INNOCENT.

WHOEVER TRIES TO CONDEMN THIS WOMAN IN sUCH A SITUATION IS A HYPOCRITE.
Therefore🀑🧟‍♀️πŸ€ͺπŸ˜±πŸ­πŸ™€πŸΈ
THATS FOR SURE.

PERFECTLY CLEAR AND PERFECTLY SIMPLE.
.TOICHE ON THAT NOTE.
AND NOW, ON A LIGHTER NOTE MAY I ASK" HAS ANYONE OUT 4HERE EVER HEARD OF THE BLACK DONNELLYS OF LUCAN CANADA?

ITS A PRETTY INTERESTING STORY.
MAY I SAY  HOW ABOUT THOSE BLACK DONNELLYS OF LUCAN ONTARIO CANADA? 

READ ABOUT EM
HERE
7THDAWNELLY.BLOGSPOT.COM 

THANK YOU.
AND LET JUSTICE RIDE.πŸ₯³πŸ™€πŸ€‘🐸🐭🀑😱πŸ€ͺ🧟‍♀️🀑





 

No comments:

Post a Comment